Business arrow increase of success graph and growth stock market earnings financial on profit income background with diagram chart investment.

Barnett Waddingham says £8.1bn paid into DB schemes was a result of higher funding levels

Contributions to defined contribution (DC) schemes have surpassed those from FTSE350 defined benefit (DB) schemes for the first time, analysis from Barnett Waddingham has found.

The analysis of FTSE350 companies in the 12 months to 31 May 2024 found £8.1bn was paid into DB schemes, while £9.9bn was paid into DC schemes over the same period.

The consultant said DB payments, which consisted of £4.7bn of deficit contributions and £3.4bn of DB pension accrual contributions, were lower as a result of improved funding positions.

It said this meant lower deficit contributions, which was just over half of the amount paid in the 2022 financial year.

The consultancy said around one third (35%) of the FTSE350 DB schemes were fully funded at the end of the most recent financial year, while 33% reached that figure during the previous financial year.

Over the next three years, Barnett Waddingham said it expected a further 20% of these schemes to reach full funding.

The analysis also found around 33 of these companies could fund more than five years of DC contributions from their DB surpluses, and half of these could fund this for a decade or more.

Principal Lewys Curteis said the analysis represents a “decisive moment” for the industry, following several years where companies chose to pay DC contributions.

“To be clear, this is the consequence of a large fall in DB contributions, reflecting the material improvement in funding positions and the reduction in the cost of DB pension accrual, rather than a step up in the level of DC contributions being paid.

“Concerns about DC pension adequacy remain, with the level of contributions generally considered to be too low to support good member outcomes. The reduction in DB pension costs and the emergence of DB scheme surpluses could provide companies with the means to redress this imbalance without materially impacting the bottom line.”

Source: Professional Pensions